Critics of the "reset" in U.S.-Russia relations often argue that a true strategic partnership between the two countries is impossible because Russia recognizes few, if any, geopolitical priorities of the United States and doesn't adhere to its "values." Writing for the January 2010 issue of The Washington Quarterly David Kramer, for instance, points to "a widening values gap between the two countries." He elaborates:
"[T]he current Russian leadership does not...share U.S. interests or threat perceptions, to say nothing of U.S. values. As long as that is the case, extensive cooperation and significantly improved relations will be difficult to achieve."
Arguments like Kramer's won't go well with many folks in Moscow used to viewing "values" in international relations as a Trojan Horse of sorts brought to their shores by the neocons. To those folks, I say, relax. "Values" are an important part of America's self-identity, and, as such, will always play a role in U.S. foreign policy. Russians who want to work on improving U.S.-Russia relations must learn to take "values" in stride, without suffering from debilitating bouts of heartburn.
And yet, I have a problem of my own with the "values gap" school of thought. Albeit the "values gap" between the United States and Russia is often invoked, it is never clearly defined, so one must figure out for themselves what exact "values" are being advanced, how the much-celebrated "gap" is formed, and why this "gap" is, if one is to believe Kramer, "widening." A discussion on this subject is urgently needed, and this post is my honest attempt at initiating such a discussion.
It's very common, in certain circles in the United States, to call Russia a "police state" while describing the U.S. as a "beacon of liberty." However, as a recent article in The Economist has reminded us, the United States leads the world in the number of incarcerated people. Roughly one in 100 adult Americans is behind bars (and this number is even higher for certain ethnic and age groups).
This is obviously not because America is an intrinsically criminal nation. Quite to the contrary, by and large Americans are very law-abiding citizens. It's overzealous prosecutors advancing their careers -- and craving to look "tough on crime" politicians -- whose actions result in the excessive locking up of ordinary folks, like the mentioned by The Economist George Norris of Spring, TX whose "crime" was sloppy paperwork in the process of importing orchids from Latin America. Facing a 10-year jail term, Mr. Norris pleaded guilty and was sentenced to "only" 17 months in prison.
But who cares about Mr. Norris when we have a Russian human rights activist, Lev Ponomarev, who was recently sentenced, by a Moscow court, to a three-day prison term? (Let me make it absolutely clear: in my opinion, Mr. Ponomarev, like Mr. Norris, has committed absolutely no crime. But in Russia, they too have overzealous police bosses loving to please their own, "tough on crime", nachal'stvo.) The logic of the "values gap" disciples would be that because Mr. Ponomarev is an opponent of the current Russian regime, the value of his liberty is higher than that of the people accused in "common" crimes in the United States. Well, try to explain this logic to Mr. Norris -- and also to Heidi Halibor of Grafton, WI who was arrested for having forgotten to return two books to the local library. A beacon of liberty indeed!
Characteristically, The Economist's article puts the blame for the situation on "the system." In contrast, the disciples of the "values gap" show no restraint in calling names: they quickly accused directly Russia's Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in Mr. Ponomarev's arrest. The logic of that is questionable. Why should Putin be blamed for every stupidity of the Moscow law enforcement authorities while no one is blaming President Obama for the jailing of a Florida man, Harry Bruder, who sent a Facebook "friend" request to his estranged wife?
While the United States leads the world in the incarceration rate (748 inmates per 100,000 population), it's trailed by Russia (600 inmates per 100,000 population). So I do see a numbers gap here, but I ain't see no values gap, dude.
For those who believe that only in Russia people die in prisons as a result of medical inattention, here is a storyof Adam Montoya who died in a federal prison in Pekin, IL of internal bleeding. For days preceding his death, Mr. Montoya pleaded with his guards to take him to the doctor. They refused. The only medication Mr. Montoya had in his prison cell was Tylenol. So far, no one has been charged with Mr. Montoya's death; we're told, however, that the Justice Department "is reviewing the case." I'm sure that the disciples of the "values gap" will argue that the value of life of "ordinary" criminals like Mr. Montoya is no match to that of, say, Sergei Magnitsky, a lawyer for a well-connected American investment firm. Go and explain that to the relatives of Mr. Montoya!
It's hardly a secret to anyone that people get murdered in the United States too. True, investigative journalists usually don't become targets of such a crime. (Is it because their investigations don't threaten any powerful interests? Is it because they've got better protection from their employers?) You have a better chance to get killed if you're an abortion doctor; a high-school or a college student; or just happen to work alongside a crazie whose constitutional rights allow him to run around brandishing a personal AK-47. Go and explain to the parents of the Columbine High victims that the lives of their children were less valuable that the one of Anna Politkovskaya because the innocent kids weren't in opposition to any "regime"!
Speaking of issues of life and death, the United States is one of the world's countries still practicing the death penalty as a means of punishment in criminal cases (finding itself in a nice company of China, Iran, and North Korea). The death penalty was de facto outlawed in Russia in 1996 (as a precondition for Russia joining the Council of Europe), and no one has been executed since then. However, capital punishment is still formally on the books, partly because the majority of Russians -- as the majority of Americans -- support the death penalty. So I do see a governance gap here, but I ain't see no values gap, dude.
I'll talk about other aspects of the "values gap" issue in future posts.
Very good post, Eugene!
I agree with most of the points you make here.
I actually did a similar exercise a few, calling it the Karlin Freedom Index. I don't think that there is now a large gap between US and Russian freedom (as arbitrarily defined - but no less arbitrarily than Freedom House - by myself). :)
Posted by: Sublime Oblivion | September 07, 2010 at 02:44 AM
Hi Eugene
Without meaning to take Kramer's general line while taking an eclectic approach, I can see his comeback relating to a comparison of prison conditions in the US versus Russia - relating to an observation someone made about how prison conditions serve as a telling gauge on how a given country approaches human rights (in the opinion of the person saying such).
Keeping in mind how a noticeable conservative element in the US feels that too much effort and money is spent on the improvement of prison life - with a more liberal view being of the belief that prison benefit perks (for lack of another term) serve to make for a better person upon his/her release.
Awhile back, I recall a talk show host discussing how he was mugged by someone with "prison muscles." This talk host suggested keeping weights out of prisons and a strict prison diet of potato salad and macaroni and cheese.
The topic you raise arguably suggests that Medvedev is (realistically speaking) an appropriate presidential successor to Putin.
Best,
Mike
Posted by: Michael Averko | September 07, 2010 at 09:31 AM
Well, Eugene - it is a very well designed & written piece, presenting a persuasively argued case (imho). I'll have to read it again, though. On the one hand I do know first-hand how Anglo-Saxon culture uses "organizational values" (which are never defined) as a cover for clearly indecent actions and/or motives. On the other - few of your examples do touch my own reasonably well-defined moral values.. I'll need to think about it. But, regardless, it was a good & interesting work. I definitely agree with the main line of your argument, though.
Cheers
Posted by: Alex | September 07, 2010 at 09:36 AM
Thanks much Anatoly, appreciate your nice comment!
I'd only add that the Freedom House's definitions of freedoms in Russia aren't arbitrary after all. They're designed in such a "clever" way that no matter what happens in Russia, the next year ratings will always be lower than the previous :)
Best Regards,
Eugene
Posted by: Eugene Ivanov | September 07, 2010 at 09:37 AM
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your comments. We could spend hours comparing notes about prison conditions in both countries. Will I agree that by and large, those in Russia are worse than in the U.S.? Absolutely!
But I'll stand by my larger, more general, point: I see no VALUES GAP (at least to the extent preventing cooperation between the two countries) with regards to liberties and respect for human life. Country-specific differences, yes; values gap, no.
Best,
Eugene
Posted by: Eugene Ivanov | September 07, 2010 at 09:44 AM
Thanks Alex,
Will be very much interested in your elaborating on some of your points. In particular, what is your definition of "organizational values"?
Happy though that we're agreeing on the major point.
Cheers,
Eugene
Posted by: Eugene Ivanov | September 07, 2010 at 09:49 AM
Very punchy post, Eugene! Inarguably, prison conditions are much worse in Russia than in the U.S. However, I'd remind that the purpose of incarceration is punishment, not rehabilitation, and that there is little evidence a prison term in the U.S. deters habitual reoffenders. Similarly, as Mike alludes above, there are quite a few in the USA who believe the present prison system coddles prisoners, and that the solution to overcrowded institutions is to make prison terms less a sweet deal that removes a good deal of the anxiety associated with making rent and grocery bills.
Customarily those in the western press who argue about a "values gap" are attempting to lead the reader to the unavoidable conclusion that Russians have none, while Westerners do. This, of course, is not so.
I daresay investigative journalists in the west would be a good deal less yappy if they did occupy a position on the danger list somewhere north of abortion doctors. At the very least, they'd stick more closely to reporting undisputed fact rather than detouring into indulgent speculation.
Posted by: Mark | September 07, 2010 at 05:14 PM
@Eugene,
I've always been under the impression Freedom House's methodology looked something like this:
Always fully Free if in "Western world"
else
Take (more or less objective) Freedom index
+1 if pro-West
-1 if anti-West
-2 if and-West and has oil
end
Posted by: Sublime Oblivion | September 07, 2010 at 06:21 PM
Organizational values are a fuzzy logic set of rules with overriding power. I.e. the organizational values in Anglo-Saxon culture can and do override outcome of any established formal bureaucratic or administrative procedure. The fuzzy logic properties mean that by definition the “values” cannot be anything but “positive” and are always “the truth”. A feature of all organizational values is that each "value" always contains two parts – one public and another classified. The latter is never disclosed to the public.
The design rule for a generalized two-part organizational value follows Orwell’s scheme: “All animals are equal (the “public set”), “but some animals are more equal than others” (the “classified” set). Important in formulating the second set is the usage of such precise criteria as “some” and “more”.
Posted by: Alex | September 08, 2010 at 12:58 AM
спасибо за отличную статью!!!(читал ее в переводе)
Posted by: Ivan | September 08, 2010 at 02:25 AM
Круто, именно таких статей и не хватает! Большой плюс статьи в том, что она сплачивает два народа и при этом заставляет правильно задуматься и пересмотреть свой взгляд на мир рядовых американцев и русских. Гуд!
Posted by: Sergey | September 08, 2010 at 03:04 AM
Hey thanks for the post, I really liked your analysis!
It looks like, though, you have overlooked two gaps that really exist in the police activity in Russia and the US:
1) Perception of the Russian police' work in Russia is much worse, compared to the US police perception in the States,
2) Surprisingly, but the US law enforcement officers use force during arrest/ kill suspects much more easily than their Russian colleagues. Especially when it comes to dealing with minorities.
Posted by: Dmitry | September 08, 2010 at 04:50 AM
http://inosmi.ru/usa/20100908/162758531.html
Posted by: Michael Averko | September 08, 2010 at 09:33 AM
Mark,
Thanks for your comments. Many things are worse in Russia than in the U.S.: prisons, court houses, hospitals, day-care centers, etc. Repeating my punch line: I do see a gap in prosperity and perhaps even careness. But I fail to immediately see a gap in values. For example, prisons are better (or at least, so they say) in Sweden and in The Netherlands. Does this mean that we have different values from the Swedes and the Dutch?
You're right: the implication of the "gap" is that Russian has none.
Best Regards,
Eugene
p.s. On a completely unrelated (but relevant to "punishment") subject: I read a while ago that a serious academic research on the hungover remedies has been traditionally opposed in the U.S. by social conservatives who beleive that folks MUST suffer from hungover as a punishment for bad behavior. You would assume that these folks will oppose any additional funding to U.S. prisons too, right?
Posted by: Eugene Ivanov | September 08, 2010 at 12:49 PM
Anatoly,
You're spot on, but even your system doesn't solve the major problem. Every year, Russia is being downgraded, and it's already quite low on the ladder. So soon a moment will come when there is no more room to downgrade it further.
I thus suggest that Kramer starts with a new initiative: to propose a special rating for Russia only, so that you can downgrade it indefinitely and in large increments: say, you arrested Ponomarev, -10; you arrested Nemtsov, -20. Etc.
Best,
Eugene
Posted by: Eugene Ivanov | September 08, 2010 at 12:56 PM
Alex,
Your scheme reminds me of a nice joke of our youth (sorry for Russian, but it looks like pretty much everyone in this space can handle it):
Все советские люди едят колбасу "Отдельная", и только отдельные советские люди колбасу "Советская."
Best,
Eugene
Posted by: Eugene Ivanov | September 08, 2010 at 01:02 PM
Иван,
Спасибо большое за похвалу. Ценю, поскольку, если не изменяет память, на моем блоге это первый комментарий по-русски.
С уважением,
Евгений
Posted by: Eugene Ivanov | September 08, 2010 at 01:06 PM
Спасибо, Сергей!
Как только что написал Ивану, читать комментарии по-русски ОСОБЕННО приятно. И главное, Вы совершенно правильно меня поняли: я не хочу разбираться, кто лучше или хуже; я хочу понять, что нам мешает сотрудничать и как это преодолеть.
С уважением,
Евгений
Posted by: Eugene Ivanov | September 08, 2010 at 01:10 PM
Dmitry,
Thanks for your comments. Sure, I've overlooked a lot of potential "specific" gaps. You mention two points I completely agree with; other people highlighted more gaps in the prison systems.
And yet, I'll be sticking to my guns: where is a gap in "values", a gap which is so "widening" that the two countries can't work together on important issues.
And I'm not naive not to know the answer. I mention David Kramer ("David the Reseterminator") often in my posts, because he's one of the most prominent inventors of reasons why the U.S. must not cooperate with Russia: values gap, Georgia, human rights issues, etc.
Regards,
Eugene
Posted by: Eugene Ivanov | September 08, 2010 at 01:21 PM
Ha, ha! That's funny about the conservative resistance to research on hangover remedies. It's part and parcel of how conservatives are so easy to fool when election time rolls around - because the place they're living in their minds is an America where you worked the same job for twenty years, got a gold watch from the company when you retired, and the boss made three or four times as much as you instead of three or four hundred times as much. An America where if a girl got pregnant but wasn't married, she had to go to another state to have the baby while her family made up some transparent story about going to the bedside of a dying aunt. An America where, if two homosexuals had the nerve to try and get married and could find a preacher crazy enough to oversee the proceedings, a bolt of God's Own Lightning would snake out of the vestry and fry all three of them in their shoes. An America where it did no harm to be polite to the nigras, because they knew their place. An America that last existed for real sometime in the 1950's and had, for all its faults, an enduring, whimsical charm.
Conservatives believe if you're suffering from anything, you probably deserve it. You'd think they'd finally die out from inbreeding, but there are an astonishing number of them. And their vote is like money in the bank.
Thanks for a good laugh; I needed that.
Posted by: Mark | September 08, 2010 at 03:35 PM
Mark,
You're right: our conservatives are too numerous to classify their reproduction as "inbred." Trust the word of a guy with PhD in genetics :)
Best,
Eugene
Posted by: Eugene Ivanov | September 08, 2010 at 05:12 PM
The quote noted at this link relates to the kind of monitoring comparsions made by some:
http://everything2.com/title/He+may+be+a+son-of-a-bitch%252C+but+he+is+our+son-of-a-bitch
As I've noted elsewhere, (some establishment venues shy away from such thoughts - motivating me to repeat them), Carter's administration trumped up human rights abuses in the USSR, while downlaying the greater abuses that were evident at the time in China and Romania. During this period, the Sino-Soviet rift was quite evident, with Romania serving as a convenient pest within the Warsaw Pact.
In more recent times, the "humanitarian" bombing of Yugoslavia and non-bombing of Turkey is my answer to the idea that the West goes out of its way to dis the so-called "Muslim street."
On that last point and in relation to Freedom House, this is the most agreeable piece I've read from Adrian Karatnycky:
http://www.leaderu.com/ftissues/ft9908/opinion/karatnycky.html
It was my pleasure to discuss some other things with Mr. Karatnycky:
http://www.opendemocracy.net/od-russia/adrian-karatnycky/partition-ukraine-i-think-not
Homerun hitters can't hit homeruns sitting on the bench. (A pointed remark at some of the higher profile of venues.)
Concerning the comment about Turkey:
http://www.kevinmckiernan.com/doc.html
Posted by: Michael Averko | September 09, 2010 at 12:35 AM
Hi, Eugene (apologies for the delay - a bit busy at the moment).
The promised POV (you asked for it, didn't you? :)
It seems, that at least in some cases, you compare a systemic and/or a deliberate abuse of the law enforcement system in Russia with accidental (by negligence) abuse in US.
Eg. it is, probably, true that Magnitsky’s death was largely an accident. “Probably” and “largely” means that jailing him at the start of investigation was a deliberate action, designed to serve as a punishment for accusing MVD of crimes and intended to be used as a leverage to make him sign the documents the investigators wanted. This was a (corrupt) judicial system’s fault and conscious intention of corrupt MVD. Non-attendance to Magnitsky’s medical needs was in line with the administered “punishment” – it just happened to be too much. On the other hand, Montoya in US waited for his verdict being a free man and died later in the prison as the result of the negligence by the people who had no personal interest in increasing his suffering.
Similarly (deliberate vs accidental) with Politkovskaya. There was no deliberate intent to kill people in issuing permit for AK-47 or in the fact of having a mentally unstable boy at school with others kids. But there was and is a systemic harassment and killing of journalists in Russia, especially those reporting on Chechya http://journalists-in-russia.org/rjournalists/view/283 (scroll & read - or search for others, eg. Estemirova, Markelov).
Where I completely agree with you is that values of the two societies – Russian and American - are indeed the same and I don’t think there is any gap, especially the widening one. Goals & methods are naturally, different, but not values. I don’t think that values of Obama and Medvedev/Putin deviate much from their respective societies either – neither wants people dying of pain (or otherwise tortured) in prisons, and most likely - they do not want them to be killed on the streets either. As you mentioned, what is indeed different is the efficiency of the “governance”. Perhaps – (some of ) the methods too. But, the “gap” in this is definitely narrowing, not widening – in fact, as the result of erosion of standards in America and improvement in Russia
Posted by: Alex | September 09, 2010 at 05:56 AM
..and a small addendum: I was not closely following the anti-abortionist activities in USA, but proper comparison with Politkovskaya would be a murder of someone WRITING in support of abortions. The doctors killed were physically performing actions. To become a comparable case, Politkovskaya should have been shooting Kadirovtsev personally.
Posted by: Alex | September 09, 2010 at 06:21 AM
First off Forgive me if i veer slightly off the topic of the article.
I think it is unwise to say that the US and Russia have a values gap when you are talking about mutual cooperation in terms of security. If the values gap between Russian the US is 10 feet wide then the gap between the US and the Taliban is a mile or more. If someone wants to exclude Russia they can just use this "values" argument as an excuse because no one understands anything about Russia nor do they want to, but they are naturally absolutely sure that it is inferior and borderline evil.
Values is just a good word cause it is vague. But in order for Russia to learn and respect those values then the US must answer the question "Does the US follow those "values" consistently and to the letter?"
Posted by: Tim Kirby | September 09, 2010 at 07:38 AM